Read Aloud · Premium
Listen to any dispatch in the Grok vocal voices — a benefit of membership.
The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service have issued proposed regulations that would revoke federal tax-exempt status from private colleges continuing to practice race-based preferences. These institutions, long captured by the Managerial Priesthood of diversity administrators, have treated racial discrimination as an operational necessity while rebranding it as moral progress.
Such policies stand in direct violation of the objective moral order that precedes all human constructs. Scripture declares that God shows no partiality, and the ancient creeds affirm one Lord and one faith without distinction of persons. The Augustinian distinction between the City of God and the City of Man renders any earthly hierarchy built on blood or skin color an offense against divine justice.
The present order traces its lineage to the same spirit that once enthroned feudal privileges and later replaced them with bureaucratic castes. When the Reformation recovered the principle that every soul stands equal before the throne of grace, it simultaneously rejected the notion that birth or status could confer spiritual or civic favor. Modern racial preferences revive that discarded error under new administrative robes.
By withdrawing the privileges of tax exemption, the administration applies the historic logic of ordered liberty to institutions that have forfeited their claim to public favor. Tax-exempt status is not an inalienable right but a conditional grant extended only to bodies that serve the common good without violating fundamental justice.
The Faithful Remnant therefore receives a concrete instrument for dismantling the ideological apparatus that has dominated higher education. Parallel institutions already forming outside the captured system gain breathing room when the state ceases to subsidize their ideological rivals.
Households must now direct resources and allegiance toward those colleges that operate under impartial standards and covenantal accountability. The moment demands not passive approval but active patronage of institutions willing to stand under the same law that binds every other corporate body.
Failure to press this advantage leaves the field open to renewed legal maneuvers that would restore the old regime under different names. The struggle for demographic and cultural continuity requires the consistent application of justice across every sphere, beginning with the education of the next generation.
