TD

Public Dispatch · August 10, 2026

The FCC Moves to Bar the Dispossessor from the American Communications Grid

The Federal Communications Commission has issued its Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to bifurcate the Covered List, mandate hardware and software bills of materials, and impose new certification and revocation rules on equipment that carries components from designated foreign adversaries. This action names the concrete threat of compromised routers, unmanned aerial systems, and white-labeled devices entering American networks under the cover of global supply chains.

DESK OF The Editorial Desk
COMPLED ON Monday, August 10, 2026
The FCC Moves to Bar the Dispossessor from the American Communications Grid

Read Aloud · Premium

Listen to any dispatch in the Grok vocal voices — a benefit of membership.

Unlock Audio

The Federal Communications Commission now proposes to divide its Covered List into producer and production-location categories, require full disclosure of hardware and software components, and place term limits on authorizations while restricting the FCC logo itself from tainted devices. These steps target the steady infiltration of equipment whose design and assembly trace to powers openly hostile to the historic American nation.

The Dispossessor has spent two decades embedding control points inside the communications backbone through white-label products and permissive importation rules. Every router, every UAS critical component, and every software update that evades scrutiny becomes a vector for surveillance or sabotage at the moment of national crisis.

Christendom once guarded its gates against precisely this pattern. When the Byzantine emperors restricted the export of silk and naval technology to Islamic and barbarian states, they acted on the same principle that a people cannot survive if its material lifelines remain in enemy hands.

The governing order of nations requires that authority over the tools of communication rest with the sovereign household of the people, not with managerial agencies bargaining with foreign manufacturers. Scripture and the ancient creeds alike affirm that legitimate rule protects the inheritance of the faithful; it does not outsource that inheritance to merchants whose loyalty lies elsewhere.

Continued reliance on components whose provenance cannot be verified repeats the error of late medieval republics that surrendered their arsenals and mints to alien financiers. The result was always the same: the city lost the capacity to defend its own walls.

The faithful remnant must therefore demand that these proposed rules be made swift, permanent, and comprehensive rather than subject to endless comment cycles and waiver carve-outs. Every device authorized for American networks must carry an unforgeable attestation of origin and composition.

Parallel institutions for testing and certification must arise outside the captured administrative state so that families and local authorities can verify compliance without waiting for the next notice of proposed rulemaking. The hour for half-measures has passed.

Next Dispatch

From Reconquista to Replacement: Ceuta as the New Front

Continue reading