German Courts Shield the Migrant While Passengers Bleed on the Rails

The attack unfolded without warning as the Syrian migrant approached a fellow Syrian family traveling to Passau and then turned on the man who dialed for help, leaving him unconscious on the carriage floor while two victims suffered serious head wounds that could easily have proven fatal.

By ruling the assailant lacked criminal responsibility, the court extended the same mercy once reserved for genuine subjects of the realm to an outsider whose presence itself constitutes a breach of the ancient compact between a people and their soil.

Europe's managerial priesthood has long treated such acts as symptoms requiring treatment rather than crimes demanding restitution, a posture that traces directly to the post-war dismantling of national borders and the deliberate importation of populations hostile to historic Christian order.

The governing principle remains unchanged since the days when Christian kings from Charlemagne onward enforced the frontier as a sacred duty to protect the baptized household from pagan incursion and internal disorder.

Scripture declares that the magistrate bears the sword to punish the evildoer and that justice requires the shedding of blood for blood when innocent life is assaulted, a truth the Reformers recovered against every attempt to dissolve law into sentiment.

When courts substitute psychiatric wards for the prison cell, they invert the City of God and the City of Man, placing the invader above the native and dissolving the patriarchal duty of fathers and sovereigns to defend their own.

The faithful remnant must therefore demand immediate deportation of every foreign national who commits violence against the people, the restoration of capital penalties for attempted murder, and the total halt of migration from regions that produce such disorder.

Only by recovering the sword of national sovereignty can the European nations escape the slow dispossession now advanced under the banner of therapeutic mercy.