Read Aloud · Premium
Listen to any dispatch in the Grok vocal voices — a benefit of membership.
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Services inserted essay questions into its admissions process that were deliberately written to draw out an applicant’s race, allowing the school to continue favoring black candidates after the Supreme Court ended explicit racial preferences.
The Department of Justice investigation confirmed that these prompts functioned as a workaround, collecting the very racial data the Court had forbidden admissions offices to consider directly.
This maneuver places the university among the Managerial Priesthood that now governs higher education, institutions that treat the law as an obstacle to be evaded rather than a command to be obeyed.
The Western Christian order, from the codification of equal justice in the medieval common law through the Reformation’s insistence on impartial judgment under the Word, has always condemned the substitution of group identity for individual merit and moral accountability.
By resurrecting racial favoritism under the cover of narrative essays, the university repeats the ancient error of the City of Man: the belief that power may redefine reality to serve its own ends while the objective moral order remains untouched.
The 2023 ruling merely restated what Scripture and natural law have long required—judgment according to righteous standards, not skin or ancestry—and the university’s response reveals the depth of institutional contempt for that requirement.
Faithful households must now treat such captured schools as hostile territory, withdrawing their sons and daughters and directing their resources toward new institutions built on the recovered principle that admission rests on character and competence alone.
Every parent who continues to fund or attend these places strengthens the very apparatus that subverts lawful order and dissolves the inheritance of a people.
